header-logo header-logo

02 August 2023
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Pay trainees & those on work experience more, firms told

The Law Society has called on firms to pay nearly 10% more to trainees and those on qualifying work experience (QWE).

For the past year, the recommended minimums have been £21,024 for trainees outside of London and £23,703 in the capital. Last week, the Law Society upped these amounts to £23,122 outside London and £26,068 in the capital for trainees or those on QWE with a view to qualifying via the Solicitors Qualification Exam.

The recommended minimum salary policy is reviewed each June, with the revised amount coming into effect in September.

‘We consider the increase in the recommended salary for aspiring solicitors to be appropriate at this time,’ said Law Society president Lubna Shuja.

‘There are a range of factors that were considered during our discussions around the minimum salary policy and uplift, including the rise in cost-of-living expenses—which have particularly hit those on lower salaries—and the economic impact on solicitors’ businesses.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll