header-logo header-logo

12 March 2015
Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Payment plans for Bar clients

Barristers will be able to offer clients “payment plans” to help them fund cases following a Bar Council agreement with an independent fund lender.

The Bar Council announced this week that it has struck a partnership agreement with Legal Cost Finance (LCF), a provider of third party credit that was founded in 2013 by Australian solicitor Dr Yuri Rapoport. The financing is provided by UK financial institutions, all of which are licensed under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and/or the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

According to the Bar Council, the key benefits for its members are: the ability to secure more instructions from clients by offering convenient and affordable payment solutions; access to a convenient billing system that helps clients settle outstanding invoices; and a guarantee of available funds to cover clients’ future legal costs.

The financing is not restricted to any particular type of legal matter or tied to the chances of success, and is available for all types of legal costs.

Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll