header-logo header-logo

PD 57AC: trial witness statement reform

26 March 2021 / Hoi-Yee Roper , Olivia Dhein
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , In Court
printer mail-detail
43918
New requirements for trial witness statements in the Business & Property Courts, outlined by LexisPSL solicitors Hoi-Yee Roper & Olivia Dhein
  • The new CPR practice direction and appendix, PD 57AC, updates the rules for trial witness statements in the Business and Property Courts.
  • It enters into force on 6 April 2021 and applies to witness statements signed on or after that date, in both existing and new proceedings.

New CPR practice direction and appendix, PD 57AC, builds on the existing CPR and includes new requirements that witness statements:

  • identify by list the documents the witness has referred to;
  • be prepared in accordance with the Statement of Best Practice contained in the appendix to PD 57AC;
  • be verified by an enhanced statement of truth known as the confirmation of compliance; and
  • be endorsed by a certificate of compliance signed by the relevant legal representative.

The provisions of PD 57AC are limited to trial witness statements in the Business and Property Courts (BPC) so other witness statements,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll