header-logo header-logo

PDS hires aim to "break" fees dispute

24 January 2014
Issue: 7592 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Profession hits back over MoJ's expansion of the Public Defender Service

Ministers are expanding the Public Defender Service (PDS) to “break” the fees dispute, legal aid campaigners have claimed.

Law Society chief executive Desmond Hudson said: “It looks like the ministry is trying to find a way to break the dispute with advocates over fees. 

“Bringing criminal defence services in-house isn’t sustainable or desirable. Evidence shows that solicitors in private practice offer substantially better value for money than solicitor services delivered through the PDS. 

“We continue to make the case to the Ministry of Justice that the most effective way to safeguard the future of high quality criminal defence is by facilitating a diverse supplier base and a market underpinned by client choice.”

Criminal barristers and solicitors are at loggerheads with the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) over its plans to cut fees by betwee17.5% to 30%. Senior barristers have been declining briefs for very high cost cases (VHCCs) at the proposed rates, while both sections of the profession boycotted courts during a half-day protest earlier this month and have indicated they may stage another protest mid-February.
 
The PDS this week appointed silks Gregory Bull QC, previously of Red Lion Chambers and a former leader of the Wales and Chester Circuit from 2010 to 2013, and Alun Jenkins QC, of Queens’ Square Chambers, Bristol, to its ranks.

It is also advertising vacancies for QCs and senior and junior higher court advocates at salaries between £46,036 and £125,000 and with 23 days holiday a year, paid time off for public holidays, two and a half privilege days, pension, free eye tests and paid paternity, maternity and adoption leave.

Nigel Lithman QC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association, in his weekly blog, said he was “sad that people who have earned well over the previous years are abandoning the Juniors and sad to learn they have merely been paying lip service to this struggle. 

“First, the few that might abandon their colleagues will not be able to do all the work. Secondly, it shows the MoJ will do anything rather than talk meaningfully to us.

“Thirdly, whilst these few are prepared to work for these cut rates, the MoJ shows itself really willing to destroy the Criminal Justice System. Client choice disappears at a stroke in this race to the bottom.”

Criminal barristers tweeted their concerns, including that the PDS will cost more than the existing system, will mean the state defending as well as prosecuting suspects, and will affect client choice.

Research in 2007 found that a PDS is one and half times to twice as expensive as private practice.

 

Issue: 7592 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll