header-logo header-logo

17 October 2018
Issue: 7813 / Categories: Legal News , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Pension benefits

A transfer of funds to a personal pension plan is a transfer of value for inheritance tax purposes, the Court of Appeal has held. In HMRC v Parry [2018] EWCA Civ 2266, Mrs Staveley (deceased) had received a share of her ex-husband’s company pension fund after an acrimonious divorce.

She transferred the fund into what was then known as a ‘section 32 buyout’, which gave the advantage of a purchase exemption. Six years later, in 2006, Mrs Staveley transferred her fund into a personal pension plan. She died less than two months later.

If the pension had remained in the section 32 policy then a lump sum would have been payable to her estate and inheritance tax levied. Under the personal pension plan, Mrs Staveley’s two sons would receive the benefit direct on her death and, if the purchase exemption applied, there would be no inheritance tax to pay.

Allowing HMRC’s appeal, however, the court held that Mrs Staveley had intended to confer a gratuitous benefit on her sons.

Issue: 7813 / Categories: Legal News , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll