header-logo header-logo

13 January 2017 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7729 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Pension schemes & taxation

nlj_7729_ramarge

Roderick Ramage explains why life assurance & automatic enrolment might be bad for you

    • The former tax regime: annual and lifetime allowances.
    • Implications of the reduction of the lifetime allowance to £1m and risks facing taxpayers with protection against the lifetime allowance charge.

    The Finance Act 1921 introduced tax relief for superannuation funds (pre-funded pension schemes established by employers) in which the assets were held under irrevocable trusts: pension tax law then consisted of the 917 words in s32 of that Act plus regulations to be made under it. This system continued with modifications for about 85 years and limited tax relief (at the risk of serious over-simplification):

    • in the case of occupational pension schemes, to the amount of benefits that could be provided (two thirds of final salary, commonly expressed as 40/60ths); and
    • in the case of personal pension schemes, later extended as an option to occupational money purchase schemes, to the amount of the contributions paid by or for the members (on a scale from 17.5% of pay increasing by
    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

    Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

    Senior associate joins family law team in London

    Tees Law—Stephen Williams

    Tees Law—Stephen Williams

    Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

    Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

    Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

    Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

    NEWS
    A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
    Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
    Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
    The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
    Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
    back-to-top-scroll