header-logo header-logo

19 July 2011
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Pensions Act 2007 (Abolition of Contracting-out for Defined Contribution Pension Schemes) (Consequential Amendments) (No 2) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/1724)

Make consequential changes to primary and secondary legislation as a result of provisions in the Pensions Acts 2007 and 2008.

Those acts provide for the abolition of contracting-out for occupational, personal and stakeholder pension schemes which contract out of the state additional pension on a defined contributions (or money purchase) basis, and the abolition of the rules governing contracted-out rights in such schemes known as “protected rights”. Together with the primary legislation, they remove the rules and references that relate to contracting-out on a defined contributions basis and protected rights and make some transitional provisions. Most rules and references will be removed from 6 April 2012. Some provisions will remain in place for a transitional period until 5 April 2015.

References to, and provisions which relate to, schemes which are contracted-out on a defined contribution basis are either omitted or, where appropriate, replaced with references to schemes which were contracted-out on that basis.

In force: 6 April 2012

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll