header-logo header-logo

Pensions: cracks in the system

18 May 2018 / Nicholas Hill , Gus Baker
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Features , Pensions
printer mail-detail
nlj_7793_hill_0

Nicholas Hill & Gus Baker report on pensions mis-selling, chicken & chips, ‘dubious advisers’, & a new wave of litigation

  • New legislation has changed the ability of people to access their pensions.
  • The evidence suggests that a major mis-selling scandal is erupting.
  • This note considers the legal landscape as pensions and financial services litigation intersect.

Between 2015 and 2017 it is estimated that 220,000 Defined Benefit (DB) pension scheme members transferred over £50bn out of DB schemes. Many of those transfers will have been on the basis of expert, regulated financial advice. Regrettably some scheme members were (according to the Work and Pensions Select Committee) ‘exploited for cynical personal gain by dubious financial advisers in tandem with parasitical so-called “introducers”’.

Practices reported in respect of transfers out of the British Steel Pension Scheme included invitations to ‘curry and chips’ or ‘chicken and chips’ events. One firm was moved to write to the Work and Pensions Select Committee to correct the Committee’s understanding about meetings it held—the firm noted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll