header-logo header-logo

Pensions mis-selling scandals warning

22 January 2015
Issue: 7637 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A top pensions law firm has warned of “confusion” and “a high level of mis-selling” when the Chancellor’s pension reforms come into force in April.

Under the Taxation of Pensions Act 2014, savers over the age of 55 will be able to withdraw as much of their pension as they want as a lump sum. Currently, they can withdraw up to 25% and must buy an annuity with the remainder. Many people have welcomed the extra control they will have over their money.

However, Katherine Dandy, partner at Sackers, says: “These reforms have been introduced too quickly and come at a time when annuities have been proven to provide poor value for many people.

“Confusion and lack of understanding will result in a significant level of mis-selling.

“The biggest risk relates to members with long service who, at the age of 55, may be tempted to transfer their final salary scheme to a money purchase scheme in order to benefit from the rule changes. For this category of members the risk is significant and the money involved that could end up being mis-sold could run in to the billions.

“The mis-selling scandal of the 1990s and the ease with which people were persuaded to part with their valuable pension pots demonstrated many were totally unaware of the value of their final salary scheme. They were often mistaken by the belief that they can do better themselves by investing the money elsewhere. This proved not to be the case, and resulted in huge claims.”

Issue: 7637 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll