header-logo header-logo

People power

07 August 2009 / Jane Mayfield
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Jane Mayfield provides a summary of the impact of the Shareholder Rights Directive

The Companies (Shareholders’ Rights) Regulations 2009 (SI 2009/1632) (the Regulations) came into force on 3 August 2009 implementing the Shareholder Rights Directive 2007/36/EC. It amends Pt 13 of the Companies Act 2006.

Principal changes include:

In respect of all companies

Voting by a proxy

On a show of hands at a meeting every proxy present has one vote. If a proxy is appointed by multiple members and has instructions to vote both for and against a resolution, he has one vote for and one vote against such resolution.

Voting in advance

A company’s articles of association may now include a provision that on a vote by poll, votes may be cast in advance. In the case of a company with voting shares admitted to trading on an EEA regulated market (a ‘traded company’), such provision may only be subject to requirements or restrictions that are necessary to ensure the identification of the person voting, and proportionate to the achievement of that objective.

Corporate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll