header-logo header-logo

07 August 2009 / Jane Mayfield
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

People power

Jane Mayfield provides a summary of the impact of the Shareholder Rights Directive

The Companies (Shareholders’ Rights) Regulations 2009 (SI 2009/1632) (the Regulations) came into force on 3 August 2009 implementing the Shareholder Rights Directive 2007/36/EC. It amends Pt 13 of the Companies Act 2006.

Principal changes include:

In respect of all companies

Voting by a proxy

On a show of hands at a meeting every proxy present has one vote. If a proxy is appointed by multiple members and has instructions to vote both for and against a resolution, he has one vote for and one vote against such resolution.

Voting in advance

A company’s articles of association may now include a provision that on a vote by poll, votes may be cast in advance. In the case of a company with voting shares admitted to trading on an EEA regulated market (a ‘traded company’), such provision may only be subject to requirements or restrictions that are necessary to ensure the identification of the person voting, and proportionate to the achievement of that objective.

Corporate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll