Jackson: Dominic Regan returns to set the record straight
Last week I faithfully recounted the objections voiced to me by practitioners about the latest Jackson reform proposals (see “Is Jackson's legacy under pressure?”). The core recommendation was a fixed costs regime applicable across the board in cases worth up to £250,000. Since I wrote that article I have received information and representations from a variety of sources, including members of the judiciary, which cast a different light upon common perceptions. Sir Rupert, quite rightly, remains aloof from the current arguments.
Practicalities
On a practical note, it is evident that nothing will change this year. The involvement of Mr Gove in the referendum campaign will be a major distraction for him. Soundings and consultation are recognised as a pre-requisite of change on this scale.
Independence
Anyone who thought that Lord Justice Jackson was speaking on behalf of the government is wrong. He is utterly independent. This was the judge brave enough in
-maryam-naaz-theo-corbett-and-rachel-carter-with-(front-from-left)-arya-vindlacheruvu-and-jessica-ashcroft.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=47f89300_1)
