header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
25 February 2016 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Perception matters

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Jackson: Dominic Regan returns to set the record straight

Last week I faithfully recounted the objections voiced to me by practitioners about the latest Jackson reform proposals (see “Is Jackson's legacy under pressure?”). The core recommendation was a fixed costs regime applicable across the board in cases worth up to £250,000. Since I wrote that article I have received information and representations from a variety of sources, including members of the judiciary, which cast a different light upon common perceptions. Sir Rupert, quite rightly, remains aloof from the current arguments.

Practicalities

On a practical note, it is evident that nothing will change this year. The involvement of Mr Gove in the referendum campaign will be a major distraction for him. Soundings and consultation are recognised as a pre-requisite of change on this scale.

Independence

Anyone who thought that Lord Justice Jackson was speaking on behalf of the government is wrong. He is utterly independent. This was the judge brave enough in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll