header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Guy Clapperton
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Perks of the job

How do law firms attract and retain talent? Guy Clapperton explains

What do the following items have in common? Four-day weeks, alternatives to partnership, talks from Lynne Truss, on-site student groups, relocation, kayaking, a private cinema, cycle loans and community work. The answer is that they are means used by law firms to attract the best employees to their organisations.

These are approaches that contrast dramatically with much of the public perception about what law firms are and what they do. The classic picture of the overworked lawyer struggling to reach partnership, after which the strain really starts to tell; the client who thinks he more or less owns the individual lawyer assigned to his case; the long hours culture; and the clichéd mighty dollar might not be things of the past just yet, but they are starting to recede into the background.

UNDERLYING TREND

It’s instructive to look at the underlying trend that’s causing this step change as it has a marked bearing on the methods used to recruit staff

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll