header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Guy Clapperton
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Perks of the job

How do law firms attract and retain talent? Guy Clapperton explains

What do the following items have in common? Four-day weeks, alternatives to partnership, talks from Lynne Truss, on-site student groups, relocation, kayaking, a private cinema, cycle loans and community work. The answer is that they are means used by law firms to attract the best employees to their organisations.

These are approaches that contrast dramatically with much of the public perception about what law firms are and what they do. The classic picture of the overworked lawyer struggling to reach partnership, after which the strain really starts to tell; the client who thinks he more or less owns the individual lawyer assigned to his case; the long hours culture; and the clichéd mighty dollar might not be things of the past just yet, but they are starting to recede into the background.

UNDERLYING TREND

It’s instructive to look at the underlying trend that’s causing this step change as it has a marked bearing on the methods used to recruit staff

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll