header-logo header-logo

Personal injury discount rate “delay”

04 September 2014
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Personal injury lawyers have slated the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) decision to “further delay” a promised review of the discount rate.

The discount rate is used to calculate damages for future losses in personal injury claims, taking into account the income a lump sum might produce.

The justice secretary confirmed to the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) last week that he will recruit a panel of experts to help him decide the next step.

However, Apil said this would “delay the process further” and accused the government of “dragging its heels”.

Three years ago, Apil brought a judicial review against the justice secretary, who told the administrative court that “his decision will be made as promptly as practicable”. The government consulted on the issue in February 2013. In July, Apil urged the justice secretary again to review the rate and warned it was prepared to start a fresh judicial review if necessary.

Apil president John Spencer says: “Injured people continue to have their damages unfairly docked by a discount rate which was set 13 years ago when the financial markets were very different.”

However, David Johnson, president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (Foil), says: “The government is taking active steps towards addressing the issue of variation of the discount rate but exercising caution and care in its approach.

“It is entirely appropriate that the government should call for a detailed analysis of the realities surrounding the investment of damages awards, before it decides whether to vary the rate and, if so, how.”

Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll