header-logo header-logo

04 September 2014
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Personal injury discount rate “delay”

Personal injury lawyers have slated the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) decision to “further delay” a promised review of the discount rate.

The discount rate is used to calculate damages for future losses in personal injury claims, taking into account the income a lump sum might produce.

The justice secretary confirmed to the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) last week that he will recruit a panel of experts to help him decide the next step.

However, Apil said this would “delay the process further” and accused the government of “dragging its heels”.

Three years ago, Apil brought a judicial review against the justice secretary, who told the administrative court that “his decision will be made as promptly as practicable”. The government consulted on the issue in February 2013. In July, Apil urged the justice secretary again to review the rate and warned it was prepared to start a fresh judicial review if necessary.

Apil president John Spencer says: “Injured people continue to have their damages unfairly docked by a discount rate which was set 13 years ago when the financial markets were very different.”

However, David Johnson, president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (Foil), says: “The government is taking active steps towards addressing the issue of variation of the discount rate but exercising caution and care in its approach.

“It is entirely appropriate that the government should call for a detailed analysis of the realities surrounding the investment of damages awards, before it decides whether to vary the rate and, if so, how.”

Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll