header-logo header-logo

Personal representatives: Sending on the substitutes

18 June 2021 / Nathan Wells
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
51263
Nathan Wells examines the removal & replacement of personal representatives
  • Claims under section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 for the removal of personal representatives: procedure and evidence.

Section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 (AJA 1985) gives the High Court jurisdiction to remove or replace personal representatives where this is necessary in the interests of the welfare of the beneficiaries and the proper administration of the estate.

The jurisdiction has proved to be a fecund source of litigation and the sphere of operation of AJA 1985, s 50 was increased by the decision in Goodman v Goodman [2013] EWHC 758 (Ch), where Newey J confirmed that it could be employed to seek the removal of a named executor (though not a potential administrator) who had not yet obtained a grant of probate.

There was, initially, a striking dearth of reported authority on the operation of the section. Fortunately, that situation has been remedied in recent years and there is a growing body of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll