header-logo header-logo

12 October 2012
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Pharmacy—Pharmaceutical services—Supply of medicine or drug

Blackbay Ventures Ltd v Secretary of State for Health and another [2012] EWHC 2635 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 12 (Oct)

The words of Art 80(b) of Council Directive (EC) 2001/83 (on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use) (the directive) and reg 9 of the Human Use (Manufacturing, Wholesale, Dealing and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/2789) were clear. They applied to all persons holding a wholesale dealer’s licence (WDL), irrespective of the purported capacity in which they acted. Regulation 9(1)(a) stated that “the holder of a wholesale dealer’s licence” should obtain supplies of relevant medicinal products only from either a manufacturer’s licence holder, or a person who themselves held a WDL for such products. Those words should be given their ordinary meaning. It followed that the claimant’s purchase of medicines from pharmacies without a WDL was in breach of the terms of reg 9 of the regulations.

The conditions applicable to the supply of medicinal products to the public were not harmonised under EU law as it presently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll