header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010 / Michael Frisby , Oliver Lawson
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Phoenix from the flames

What can be salvaged from the wreckage of insolvency? Michael Frisby & Oliver Lawson report

In the current economic environment, more clients are experiencing customer payment default. When a debtor company fails to pay or becomes insolvent, clients want to know what actions they can take to mitigate losses, rather than simply claiming as an unsecured creditor in liquidation. The options available will depend on the circumstances of the case, but it may be possible to recover goods and in certain circumstances directors of the debtor company may be personally liable for the debt.

Where goods have been supplied under a contract containing a retention of title (RoT) clause, an unpaid seller can recover goods in the event of non-payment. 

It is essential to act quickly in pursuing an RoT claim. A written demand should be made to the debtor (or usually the administrator, liquidator or receiver of the debtor) notifying them that you are exercising your right to recover your goods and demanding that they be made available for collection.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll