header-logo header-logo

20 September 2023
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

PII higher for smaller firms

The average professional indemnity insurance (PII) premium is equivalent to 5% of a law firm’s annual turnover—but small firms pay more
Research commissioned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and Legal Services Board (LSB) found premiums typically ranged between 3% and 9% of annual turnover, with a 5% median.

However, the research identified that one in five of the 300 firms studied paid premiums worth 10% of turnover or even more. The vast majority (90%) of these firms paying 10% or more were small firms.

The researchers investigated the reasons for the difference. The key factor was practice area—the more property work a firm did, the higher their premium, with analysis suggesting such work attracts premiums of 8%–12% of turnover. In contrast, work on uncontested divorces was estimated to attract premiums of between 2%–7% of turnover.

Firms were also charged higher premiums where they had a history of regulatory findings, had a higher ratio of fee earners and qualified fee earners compared to turnover, or tended to hold more client money.

Other factors included the relative sophistication of the firm’s cyber and security arrangements, ability to absorb losses or recompense clients from other work, and the size of the overall premium paid as the higher the fee the more open the insurer to a bespoke arrangement.

The SRA and LSB said their discussions with insurers indicated premiums are unlikely to fall in the near term. The research, ‘Econometric analysis of PII costs for legal services providers’, was published last week.

Separately, the Law Society has revised its practice note on PII. Law Society president Lubna Shuja said the note was ‘new and improved’, and would benefit the ‘almost 40% of solicitors’ firms [who] still renew their PII on the old common renewal date of 1 October’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll