header-logo header-logo

05 November 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Pillsbury has appointed The Rt Hon the Lord Garnier KC as senior counsel in its London office, continuing the firm’s rapid growth in the UK. A member of the House of Lords and former Solicitor General for England and Wales, Lord Garnier is one of the country’s most respected silks, practising from 4 Pump Court. He brings decades of experience across corporate crime, human rights, sanctions, and media law, as well as deep insight into government investigations.

Firm chair David Dekker said Lord Garnier ‘has unsurpassed experience navigating the intricacies of investigations, from both government and private practice perspectives’. He added that Pillsbury’s London office ‘has grown by over 30% in the last twelve months’, underscoring its strategic importance to the firm’s global platform.

Deborah Baum, Pillsbury’s global head of litigation, described Lord Garnier as ‘among the UK’s most influential figures in financial crime and investigations’. London managing partner Matthew Oresman said his arrival ‘serves as testament of our ability to attract the most qualified and sought-after legal advisors’. Head of UK corporate investigations and white collar defence Audrey Koh added that the expansion of the London white-collar team was ‘both natural and timely’ in light of new UK legislation, including the ‘failure to prevent fraud’ offence.

Lord Garnier said he was ‘delighted to be working with the expanding Pillsbury team’, noting that he hopes to bring his ‘nearly 50 years’ experience at the Bars of England and Wales and of Northern Ireland’ to the firm’s cross-border practice. ‘Having brought DPAs from America to England, I know there is a huge amount we British lawyers can learn from our US counterparts,’ he said.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll