header-logo header-logo

09 July 2021 / Martin Rackstraw
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Plaku: a missed opportunity?

52398
Decisions which lengthen sentences for no obvious reason will not help an already critical situation, as Martin Rackstraw reports

The backlog of Crown Court cases waiting to be heard stands at almost 60,000. UK prisons remain chronically overcrowded, dangerous and unhealthy. The criminal justice system—already under severe strain before the pandemic—is near breaking point. But the Court of Appeal, it appears, never misses an opportunity to ensure that more defendants are locked up for as long as possible.

In the latest in a series of dispiriting judgments, in R v Plaku and others [2021] EWCA Crim 568, [2021] All ER (D) 56 (Apr) the court considered the question of when the maximum one-third reduction should be applied to a sentence in the Crown Court. The decision will cause considerable difficulties for defence practitioners and judges, and should be of concern to anyone who cares about having an effective and proportionate system of sentencing.

What was the main issue facing the court?

If a defendant enters a formal guilty plea at their first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll