header-logo header-logo

09 July 2021 / Martin Rackstraw
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Plaku: a missed opportunity?

52398
Decisions which lengthen sentences for no obvious reason will not help an already critical situation, as Martin Rackstraw reports

The backlog of Crown Court cases waiting to be heard stands at almost 60,000. UK prisons remain chronically overcrowded, dangerous and unhealthy. The criminal justice system—already under severe strain before the pandemic—is near breaking point. But the Court of Appeal, it appears, never misses an opportunity to ensure that more defendants are locked up for as long as possible.

In the latest in a series of dispiriting judgments, in R v Plaku and others [2021] EWCA Crim 568, [2021] All ER (D) 56 (Apr) the court considered the question of when the maximum one-third reduction should be applied to a sentence in the Crown Court. The decision will cause considerable difficulties for defence practitioners and judges, and should be of concern to anyone who cares about having an effective and proportionate system of sentencing.

What was the main issue facing the court?

If a defendant enters a formal guilty plea at their first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll