header-logo header-logo

10 November 2023 / Beth Gascoyne
Issue: 8048 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Planning for tall buildings—the challenges & rewards

146035
High buildings such as the Shard are dramatic but the planning can be highly political, writes Beth Gascoyne
  • Our cities’ skylines are ever-changing, but the process of altering this skyline can be fraught with political and legal challenges.
  • Stakeholders compete to balance the need for more housing, efficient use of land, and a growing population with the preservation of celebrated and historic vistas and protection of landmarks and buildings.
  • With ever more public wrangling over planning for tall buildings, it is likely that decisions will increasingly be made by politicians.

London’s iconic skyline is an ever-changing landscape. However, the process of altering this skyline can be fraught with political and legal challenges, as stakeholders compete to balance the need for more housing, efficient use of land, and a growing population with the preservation of celebrated and historic vistas and protection of landmarks and buildings. Such difficulties were highlighted towards the end of 2021 when the government’s department for levelling up, housing and communities finally rejected the long-debated plans

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll