header-logo header-logo

01 October 2009 / Martin Bonney
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Features , Technology
printer mail-detail

Playing by the rules

Procedure & principle count in e-disclosure. Martin Bonney explains why

The principles of disclosure are once again being scrutinised as Lord Justice Jackson continues his fundamental review of the costs of civil litigation.

His review was commissioned by the Master of the Rolls in response to the perceived rise in the cost of civil litigation amongst both those bringing claims and those that most regularly have to foot the bill. Jackson’s key question throughout is: how can justice be done while keeping the costs proportionate? In his interim report—published in May—he has laid out a range options for reform to the system, many of them quite extensive.

This is no less true of e-disclosure than other areas and the report contains considerable analysis of e-disclosure, contained in ch 40, 41.

Jackson has identified the discovery process as one of the major contributors to the cost of civil litigation and has made it clear that this is one of the key aspects that he intends to address when his final recommendations are published at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll