Playing the blame game: an abuse of process?

21 July 2023 / Michael Bundock

Issue: 8034 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Professional negligence

What next when a disgruntled litigant decides to sue their lawyer for negligence after losing a case? Michael Bundock examines when such a claim may be struck out as an abuse

Losing litigants sometimes sue their lawyers for negligence.
Such claims involve scrutiny of the original judgment.
In what circumstances will they be struck out as an abuse?

Every litigation lawyer is familiar with the complaints of the disappointed litigant. Cases have winners and losers, and the losing party may point the finger of blame at their lawyers. In some cases, they may sue for professional negligence.

If such a claim is to succeed, the claimant must persuade the judge that, had the lawyer not been negligent, the court would (or, at least, might) have reached a different decision. Therefore, the negligence claim necessarily involves scrutiny of the earlier court decision.

If a litigant has lost a claim because of the negligence of the solicitor or barrister involved, it is in most cases right

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Playing the blame game: an abuse of process?

What next when a disgruntled litigant decides to sue their lawyer for negligence after losing a case? Michael Bundock examines when such a claim may be struck out as an abuse

Losing litigants sometimes sue their lawyers for negligence.
Such claims involve scrutiny of the original judgment.
In what circumstances will they be struck out as an abuse?

If a litigant has lost a claim because of the negligence of the solicitor or barrister involved, it is in most cases right

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Making Big Tech pay for digital addiction

Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ

NLJ this week: Leaseholders stuck in limbo

The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ

NLJ this week: When a trial period becomes a ‘reasonable adjustment’

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law

NLJ this week: Ignore covenants at your peril

Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ

NLJ this week: Courts caught in a ‘hierarchy of privacy’

Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design

Error message

Playing the blame game: an abuse of process?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Corker Binning—Priya Dave