header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Pleading hell!

Dominic Regan suggests how to avoid some common pitfalls

Pleadings are important! I use the quaint term for it is more elegant than statement of case. The guidance issued by Lord Woolf MR in Mcphilemy v Times Newspapers Ltd [1999] 3 All ER 775 says it all. “Pleadings are still required to mark out the parameters of the case that is being advanced by each party. In particular they are still critical to identify the issues and the extent of the dispute between the parties.” Mistakes can lead to negligence actions. Here are some common pitfalls best avoided.

If you don’t ask you don’t get! Contributory negligence can diminish awards significantly but if the matter is not pleaded it is beyond the powers of the court to award anything but full damages. In Cto v Dziennik [2006] EWCA Civ 1456, [2006] All ER (D) 157 (Nov) on overwhelming evidence, the trial judge decided that the claimant was substantially at fault and deducted 60% from his award. Held: there was no pleaded allegation of contributory fault so

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Irwin Mitchell—Louisa Donaghy

Irwin Mitchell—Louisa Donaghy

National military team expands in Leeds with legal director appointment

Taylor Wessing—Jamie Humphreys

Taylor Wessing—Jamie Humphreys

Disputes and investigations team welcomes product liability partner hire

Spector Constant & Williams—Michael Michaeloudis and team

Spector Constant & Williams—Michael Michaeloudis and team

London firm launches employment department with four-lawyer team hire

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll