header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Pleading hell!

Dominic Regan suggests how to avoid some common pitfalls

Pleadings are important! I use the quaint term for it is more elegant than statement of case. The guidance issued by Lord Woolf MR in Mcphilemy v Times Newspapers Ltd [1999] 3 All ER 775 says it all. “Pleadings are still required to mark out the parameters of the case that is being advanced by each party. In particular they are still critical to identify the issues and the extent of the dispute between the parties.” Mistakes can lead to negligence actions. Here are some common pitfalls best avoided.

If you don’t ask you don’t get! Contributory negligence can diminish awards significantly but if the matter is not pleaded it is beyond the powers of the court to award anything but full damages. In Cto v Dziennik [2006] EWCA Civ 1456, [2006] All ER (D) 157 (Nov) on overwhelming evidence, the trial judge decided that the claimant was substantially at fault and deducted 60% from his award. Held: there was no pleaded allegation of contributory fault so

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll