header-logo header-logo

Pleading hell!

27 May 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan suggests how to avoid some common pitfalls

Pleadings are important! I use the quaint term for it is more elegant than statement of case. The guidance issued by Lord Woolf MR in Mcphilemy v Times Newspapers Ltd [1999] 3 All ER 775 says it all. “Pleadings are still required to mark out the parameters of the case that is being advanced by each party. In particular they are still critical to identify the issues and the extent of the dispute between the parties.” Mistakes can lead to negligence actions. Here are some common pitfalls best avoided.

If you don’t ask you don’t get! Contributory negligence can diminish awards significantly but if the matter is not pleaded it is beyond the powers of the court to award anything but full damages. In Cto v Dziennik [2006] EWCA Civ 1456, [2006] All ER (D) 157 (Nov) on overwhelming evidence, the trial judge decided that the claimant was substantially at fault and deducted 60% from his award. Held: there was no pleaded allegation of contributory fault so

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Succession and tax team welcomes partner inLondon

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Firm appoints senior associate to lead Manchester city centre team

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll