header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Poles apart?

David Winch compares and contrasts confiscation procedures north and south of the border

The approach taken to confiscation computations in “criminal lifestyle” cases by prosecutors in England and Wales and in Scotland is fundamentally different—even where both sets of prosecutors are proceeding under identically worded legislation.

In England and Wales, Pt 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (PCA 2002) applies in confiscation cases where all of the relevant offences were committed after 23 March 2003. Part 3 of PCA 2002 applies in confiscation cases in Scotland on the same basis. The wording of PCA 2002, Pts 2, 3 are, for the most part, very similar. One might therefore expect that, in similar circumstances, the outcome of confiscation proceedings based on the same facts would be much the same north and south of the border. Such an expectation would be misplaced.

Differences in legislation
Although PCA 2002, Pts 2, 3 are very similar in wording there are some differences.

Perhaps the most significant of these are that s 92 in Scotland requires the court, before making

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll