header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Poles apart?

David Winch compares and contrasts confiscation procedures north and south of the border

The approach taken to confiscation computations in “criminal lifestyle” cases by prosecutors in England and Wales and in Scotland is fundamentally different—even where both sets of prosecutors are proceeding under identically worded legislation.

In England and Wales, Pt 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (PCA 2002) applies in confiscation cases where all of the relevant offences were committed after 23 March 2003. Part 3 of PCA 2002 applies in confiscation cases in Scotland on the same basis. The wording of PCA 2002, Pts 2, 3 are, for the most part, very similar. One might therefore expect that, in similar circumstances, the outcome of confiscation proceedings based on the same facts would be much the same north and south of the border. Such an expectation would be misplaced.

Differences in legislation
Although PCA 2002, Pts 2, 3 are very similar in wording there are some differences.

Perhaps the most significant of these are that s 92 in Scotland requires the court, before making

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll