header-logo header-logo

Poles apart?

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

David Winch compares and contrasts confiscation procedures north and south of the border

The approach taken to confiscation computations in “criminal lifestyle” cases by prosecutors in England and Wales and in Scotland is fundamentally different—even where both sets of prosecutors are proceeding under identically worded legislation.

In England and Wales, Pt 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (PCA 2002) applies in confiscation cases where all of the relevant offences were committed after 23 March 2003. Part 3 of PCA 2002 applies in confiscation cases in Scotland on the same basis. The wording of PCA 2002, Pts 2, 3 are, for the most part, very similar. One might therefore expect that, in similar circumstances, the outcome of confiscation proceedings based on the same facts would be much the same north and south of the border. Such an expectation would be misplaced.

Differences in legislation
Although PCA 2002, Pts 2, 3 are very similar in wording there are some differences.

Perhaps the most significant of these are that s 92 in Scotland requires the court, before making a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll