header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Poles apart?

David Winch compares and contrasts confiscation procedures north and south of the border

The approach taken to confiscation computations in “criminal lifestyle” cases by prosecutors in England and Wales and in Scotland is fundamentally different—even where both sets of prosecutors are proceeding under identically worded legislation.

In England and Wales, Pt 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (PCA 2002) applies in confiscation cases where all of the relevant offences were committed after 23 March 2003. Part 3 of PCA 2002 applies in confiscation cases in Scotland on the same basis. The wording of PCA 2002, Pts 2, 3 are, for the most part, very similar. One might therefore expect that, in similar circumstances, the outcome of confiscation proceedings based on the same facts would be much the same north and south of the border. Such an expectation would be misplaced.

Differences in legislation
Although PCA 2002, Pts 2, 3 are very similar in wording there are some differences.

Perhaps the most significant of these are that s 92 in Scotland requires the court, before making

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll