header-logo header-logo

11 December 2009
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Police

R (on the application of Laws) v Police Medical Appeal Board [2009] EWHC 3135 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 38 (Dec)

The proceedings concerned a constable who had been found for the purposes of reg H1 of the Police Pensions Regulations 1987 (SI 1987/257), to be disabled from performing the ordinary duties of a member of the police force. It was also found that her disability was likely to be permanent.

The court ruled that each determination of the select medical practitioner, or on appeal by the board, was to be treated as final; thus, where an injury pension had been reassessed under reg 37 of the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/932), and a decision had been made by the select medical practitioner concerning the degree of the recipient’s disablement at that date, that decision was final for all purposes, subject to the continuing duty, periodically, to reassess the pension under reg 37.

While the Metropolitan Police Association had a duty under reg 37 to carry out from time to time further reviews of a potential

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll