header-logo header-logo

11 December 2009
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Police

R (on the application of Laws) v Police Medical Appeal Board [2009] EWHC 3135 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 38 (Dec)

The proceedings concerned a constable who had been found for the purposes of reg H1 of the Police Pensions Regulations 1987 (SI 1987/257), to be disabled from performing the ordinary duties of a member of the police force. It was also found that her disability was likely to be permanent.

The court ruled that each determination of the select medical practitioner, or on appeal by the board, was to be treated as final; thus, where an injury pension had been reassessed under reg 37 of the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/932), and a decision had been made by the select medical practitioner concerning the degree of the recipient’s disablement at that date, that decision was final for all purposes, subject to the continuing duty, periodically, to reassess the pension under reg 37.

While the Metropolitan Police Association had a duty under reg 37 to carry out from time to time further reviews of a potential

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll