header-logo header-logo

Police Bill endangers travellers’ rights

08 July 2021
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities are at significant risk of having their human rights breached by legislation to criminalise unauthorised encampments, a Parliamentary committee has warned
In its third report into the controversial Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, the Joint Committee on Human Rights examines Part 4 of the Bill, which relates to encampments. Part 4 introduces a criminal offence of trespass with intent to reside, along with additional police powers to seize mobile homes for up to three months where there is reasonable suspicion this offence has been committed.

The committee found the Bill would create extra burdens on public authorities dealing with people living in unauthorised encampments.

It urged the government instead to reintroduce the statutory duty on local authorities to provide sites for these communities, and to amend the bill so a criminal offence is committed only where an adequate authorised site has been made available.

It called for an amendment so that a caravan cannot be seized if it is a person’s principal home and they would have nowhere else to live. The legislation must be sufficient clear for the police to enforce its provisions, the committee said, and conditions entirely based on potential acts and potential impacts should be removed.

Committee chair Harriet Harman said: ‘This Bill takes a major step in making it a criminal offence for Gypsy, Roma and Travellers communities to be on private land without consent.’

Harman said the committee’s proposals would ensure the human rights of these communities are respected at the same times as landowners have their property rights protected.

The Bill passed its third reading this week. Attention has focused on several controversial aspects, notably extra powers for police to curb protests, including where only one person is protesting, on the basis of ‘noise’; increased powers of stop and search; and up to ten years in prison for damaging a memorial.

Issue: 7940 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll