header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Fees
printer mail-detail

Policy pay loss

In brief

The High Court has rejected a bid by police forces in England, Wales and Northern Ireland to have a pay award of 2.5% backdated to September 2007. The police, who were given 14 days to appeal the ruling, had said that the home secretary had acted unlawfully in delaying the pay award following a recommendation by an independent arbitration panel. In his judgment, Lord Justice Keene said the police were “deprived of the most powerful weapon normally available to a group of working people, the ability to withdraw their labour, when it comes to seeking to protect or improve their pay and working conditions”.

 

Issue: 7325 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll