header-logo header-logo

Policing the referral fees ban

21 June 2012
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SRA unable to fully enforce referral fee ban due to ABSs

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has acknowledged it will be unable to fully enforce the ban on referral fees for personal injury cases due to law firms forming alternative business structures (ABSs), as well as difficulties in defining “referral”.

It has also predicted a bleak future for small firms doing personal injury work, as large firms pick up leads from small referral networks that are unable to respond to the ban, due to come into force in April 2013. This, combined with existing challenges such as the stagnant housing market, could lead to “a steep increase in the number of financial failures among small firms”, according to an SRA discussion paper published last week.

The SRA paper says policing referral arrangements that involve advertising will be “problematic”, as claims management companies “may legitimately argue that they are carrying out marketing for groups of firms”.

Claims management companies could also avoid the ban by joining with a firm of solicitors to become an ABS.

“There would be no need for referrals, and therefore no referral fees would be paid,” the SRA paper states.

“We believe that, provided that all of the requirements for authorisation are met and the ABS complies with all of its regulatory obligations, we cannot seek to prevent such arrangements simply because they are set up to avoid being caught by the ban.”

The SRA warns that it could impose licence conditions on an ABS or refuse authorisation.
John Wotton, Law Society president, says: “The ban should not prevent firms’ legitimate marketing activity.”

Issue: 7519 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll