header-logo header-logo

21 June 2012
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Policing the referral fees ban

SRA unable to fully enforce referral fee ban due to ABSs

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has acknowledged it will be unable to fully enforce the ban on referral fees for personal injury cases due to law firms forming alternative business structures (ABSs), as well as difficulties in defining “referral”.

It has also predicted a bleak future for small firms doing personal injury work, as large firms pick up leads from small referral networks that are unable to respond to the ban, due to come into force in April 2013. This, combined with existing challenges such as the stagnant housing market, could lead to “a steep increase in the number of financial failures among small firms”, according to an SRA discussion paper published last week.

The SRA paper says policing referral arrangements that involve advertising will be “problematic”, as claims management companies “may legitimately argue that they are carrying out marketing for groups of firms”.

Claims management companies could also avoid the ban by joining with a firm of solicitors to become an ABS.

“There would be no need for referrals, and therefore no referral fees would be paid,” the SRA paper states.

“We believe that, provided that all of the requirements for authorisation are met and the ABS complies with all of its regulatory obligations, we cannot seek to prevent such arrangements simply because they are set up to avoid being caught by the ban.”

The SRA warns that it could impose licence conditions on an ABS or refuse authorisation.
John Wotton, Law Society president, says: “The ban should not prevent firms’ legitimate marketing activity.”

Issue: 7519 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll