header-logo header-logo

21 June 2012
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Policing the referral fees ban

SRA unable to fully enforce referral fee ban due to ABSs

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has acknowledged it will be unable to fully enforce the ban on referral fees for personal injury cases due to law firms forming alternative business structures (ABSs), as well as difficulties in defining “referral”.

It has also predicted a bleak future for small firms doing personal injury work, as large firms pick up leads from small referral networks that are unable to respond to the ban, due to come into force in April 2013. This, combined with existing challenges such as the stagnant housing market, could lead to “a steep increase in the number of financial failures among small firms”, according to an SRA discussion paper published last week.

The SRA paper says policing referral arrangements that involve advertising will be “problematic”, as claims management companies “may legitimately argue that they are carrying out marketing for groups of firms”.

Claims management companies could also avoid the ban by joining with a firm of solicitors to become an ABS.

“There would be no need for referrals, and therefore no referral fees would be paid,” the SRA paper states.

“We believe that, provided that all of the requirements for authorisation are met and the ABS complies with all of its regulatory obligations, we cannot seek to prevent such arrangements simply because they are set up to avoid being caught by the ban.”

The SRA warns that it could impose licence conditions on an ABS or refuse authorisation.
John Wotton, Law Society president, says: “The ban should not prevent firms’ legitimate marketing activity.”

Issue: 7519 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll