header-logo header-logo

03 November 2021
Issue: 7955 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

Poll casts doubt on commonhold reform

Leasehold practitioners have reported low interest in commonhold since the government proposed reforms in January

The proposals included the removal of ground rent and marriage value, and the establishment of a Commonhold Council to advise the government on implementation of commonhold, which allows homeowners to own the freehold of individual flats in a block or houses on an estate.

However, fewer than one in ten leasehold practitioners report an increase in general or specific enquiries about commonhold since January―suggesting either lack of interest or scepticism about the reforms coming to fruition. Only 3.6% of the practitioners had an increase in specific enquiries.

The poll was commissioned by the government and conducted among Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners (ALEP) members. ALEP members work as valuers, solicitors and barristers in the leasehold sector, so their clients are among those most likely to convert to the commonhold model.

One respondent, who works as a valuer, said: ‘Many clients are individual lessees, and our experience is that even in blocks of flats as small as six it is often hard to get enough consensus to enfranchise, so to change to commonhold must be just as potentially difficult.’

Another respondent said: ‘Commonhold is probably seen as unnecessary, if similar results can be obtained by the lessees of flats purchasing the freehold of their block and extending their leases, with which the majority of flat owners are familiar.’

Moreover, the government has provided no timetable for reform, and ALEP members doubt it will come soon.

Solicitor Mark Chick, a director of ALEP, said: “98% of delegates who voted at our recent conference indicated that they thought there was no prospect of reform in the next two years―something that is perhaps not surprising, given the number of things that will need to be “fixed” to make commonhold work.’ 

Issue: 7955 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll