header-logo header-logo

Positive steps

04 June 2009 / Andrew Berkeley , Justin Michaelson
Issue: 7372 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The draft Bribery Bill is a step in the right direction, say Justin Michaelson & Andrew Berkeley

The boundary edges of good business are sometimes blurred in the name of competitive advantage and it is not right, nor is it fair, for one business to be favoured over another simply because that business paid a bribe. The draft Bribery Bill, which arose out of a lengthy consultation process involving a full report by the Law Commission (Reforming Bribery) is a positive step to improve public trust in international business and seek to maintain a level playing field in the international marketplace. But a level playing field works both ways.

As far as the UK is concerned, the government hopes to tighten up the regime with the new Bribery Bill. The US has led the way for decades, with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 (FCPA), and later the international community with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials (the Convention).

The UK is in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll