header-logo header-logo

04 June 2009 / Andrew Berkeley , Justin Michaelson
Issue: 7372 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Positive steps

The draft Bribery Bill is a step in the right direction, say Justin Michaelson & Andrew Berkeley

The boundary edges of good business are sometimes blurred in the name of competitive advantage and it is not right, nor is it fair, for one business to be favoured over another simply because that business paid a bribe. The draft Bribery Bill, which arose out of a lengthy consultation process involving a full report by the Law Commission (Reforming Bribery) is a positive step to improve public trust in international business and seek to maintain a level playing field in the international marketplace. But a level playing field works both ways.

As far as the UK is concerned, the government hopes to tighten up the regime with the new Bribery Bill. The US has led the way for decades, with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 (FCPA), and later the international community with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials (the Convention).

The UK is in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll