header-logo header-logo

25 October 2018
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Post-Brexit criminals in doubt

The legal professions have been given ‘no information’ on the position of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) post-Brexit, the chair of the Bar has told MPs.

Giving evidence to the Justice Committee this week, Andrew Walker QC said the EAW was part of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) jurisdiction, therefore to replicate it, ‘we are asking the EU to have a new legal order without the ECJ being involved’.

Asked if losing the EAW would lead to less justice, more cost and more delay, Walker agreed. He said the UK faced the prospect of people not being brought to justice, criminals and terrorists fleeing across borders, the UK seizing criminals but not getting the information they needed, or not getting the information in time.

Pressed on the issue, Justice Minister Lucy Frazer QC said the EAW was a Home Office matter but acknowledged her department was responsible for matters related to it.

Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll