header-logo header-logo

EAWs: is Poland on a final warning?

20 April 2018 / George Hepburne Scott
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail
nlj_7789_scott

George Hepburne Scott considers how changes to the judiciary in Poland could affect Britain’s post-Brexit extradition relationship with the EU

  • Considers whether the mutual trust and confidence between judicial authorities within Europe which underpins the entire Extradition Arrest Warrant system is under threat.

The recent Irish High Court case of Minister for Justice and Equality v Artur Celmer 2017 EXT 291 (handed down on 12 March 2018) could have serious consequences for Poland’s membership of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) system. This is important for the UK because more people are extradited from England and Wales via Polish-issued EAWs than any other (source: National Crime Agency).

In the case of Celmer, Donnelly J was referred to the profound concerns that the European Commission and the European Council have regarding the current Polish government’s interference with the judiciary. Such is the level of concern that the European Commission has sent a ‘Reasoned Proposal’ to the European Council under Art 7 of the Treaty of the European Union (‘the Treaty

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll