header-logo header-logo

20 April 2018 / George Hepburne Scott
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

EAWs: is Poland on a final warning?

nlj_7789_scott

George Hepburne Scott considers how changes to the judiciary in Poland could affect Britain’s post-Brexit extradition relationship with the EU

  • Considers whether the mutual trust and confidence between judicial authorities within Europe which underpins the entire Extradition Arrest Warrant system is under threat.

The recent Irish High Court case of Minister for Justice and Equality v Artur Celmer 2017 EXT 291 (handed down on 12 March 2018) could have serious consequences for Poland’s membership of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) system. This is important for the UK because more people are extradited from England and Wales via Polish-issued EAWs than any other (source: National Crime Agency).

In the case of Celmer, Donnelly J was referred to the profound concerns that the European Commission and the European Council have regarding the current Polish government’s interference with the judiciary. Such is the level of concern that the European Commission has sent a ‘Reasoned Proposal’ to the European Council under Art 7 of the Treaty of the European Union (‘the Treaty

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll