header-logo header-logo

Post-Brexit enforcement of EU rules

09 September 2022
Issue: 7993 / Categories: Legal News , Environment
printer mail-detail
European nature conservation laws remain enforceable against the Environment Agency, despite the UK having left the EU, the High Court has held in a landmark case

Ruling this week in Harris vs Environment Agency [2022] EWHC 2264 (Admin), Mr Justice Johnson held the Environment Agency failed to do enough to protect rare wetland species and habitats in the Norfolk Broads from the impact of water abstraction licenced by the Environment Agency for agricultural and other purposes. He found the Environment Agency acted irrationally, in breach of European law (the Habitats Directive) and in breach of domestic law.

In his decision, Johnson J recognised and applied a key, but little-known, legal provision in the UK’s EU-exit legislation, which says rules in European Directives remain enforceable against UK public authorities post-Brexit if those rules had been recognised by a court as being enforceable prior to Brexit. In Harris, the provision applied to rules under the Habitats Directive.

He also held the Environment Agency could not use lack of funding as a valid justification for failing to comply with its legal duties in this case.

Penny Simpson, environmental law partner at Freeths, who represented claimants Mr and Mrs Harris, said: ‘This is a very important court judgment for both East Anglia and the UK.

‘For East Anglia there must now be significant and urgent work by the Environment Agency to prevent damage from water abstraction to the large Broads conservation area.

‘For England and Wales, we now know that public authorities must take appropriate steps to prevent harm to sites protected under the Habitats Directive.

‘For the UK as a whole, this case has wide-reaching implications. It recognises that, even though the UK has left the EU, the UK has not escaped the direct influence of European Directives if, prior to Brexit, those rules had been found by a court to be directly enforceable against public authorities.

‘Where this applies, individuals can continue to rely upon those rules against public authorities. This would be the case even if Parliament were to amend or remove specific existing domestic legislation which implements a European Directive.’

Issue: 7993 / Categories: Legal News , Environment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll