header-logo header-logo

04 May 2017
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The post-election horizon

Senior lawyer predicts delays to civil justice reform

Civil justice reforms are likely to be delayed in the wake of the 8 June General Election, a senior litigation solicitor has predicted.

The Prisons and Courts Bill has already been shelved in the run-up to the election. It contained provisions on the proposed online civil court as well as prison reforms, restrictions to compensation for whiplash injuries and safeguards for domestic abuse victims facing the perpetrator in the family court.

Writing in NLJ this week, consultant editor David Greene, a senior partner at Edwin Coe, predicts that another casualty, in the event of a post-election reshuffle, could be the current Lord Chancellor Liz Truss. During her 10-month tenure, Truss has irked claimant lawyers by proposing whiplash reforms and incurred criticism for failing to robustly defend judges. She also lowered the discount rate—a move praised by lawyers but criticised by many people outside the legal profession.

Should the Conservatives win next month, Greene predicts the continuation of existing plans regarding the extension of fixed fees and the digitisation of process. Therefore, the Prisons and Courts Bill could be revived.

He notes that Lord Justice Jackson is due to report in July on his fixed costs proposals.

‘While he will still report, if his proposals find favour we may expect any implementation is likely to be pushed back somewhat, particularly if they need primary legislation,’ he says.

‘The Briggs reforms were in part included in the Prisons and Courts Bill establishing the online court. These will be delayed certainly by the election. It is always possible that even a Conservative government with a substantial majority and a new Lord Chancellor will want to complete a review of LASPO and possibly other aspects of the civil justice process before making further reforms.’

Issue: 7744 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll