header-logo header-logo

Post-mortem capacity assessments

13 June 2019 / Giles Eyre , Linda Monaci
Issue: 7844 / Categories: Features , Mental health , Wills & Probate , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Giles Eyre & Dr Linda Monaci provide practical insight into assessing a testator’s capacity after their death

  • Assessing mental capacity retrospectively is a difficult task: it is essential to instruct an expert, such as a neuropsychologist, to provide a mental capacity assessment on the basis of the evidence then available.

Marie was born in France but had lived in the UK for the last 35 years. She died of dementia aged 88 in a nursing home, leaving under her will a considerable wealth to her four children, but divided unequally, and a legacy to an unrelated younger man.

Two of her children who lived abroad instructed a solicitor to contest the will as they claimed she lacked capacity at the time that the will was made and that the assets should be divided equally among all four children, in accordance with her previous will, and that the gift of £20,000 she had made to a man in his fifties should not be allowed as they claimed he had been a younger

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll