header-logo header-logo

Potanina & the grant of permission without notice

16 February 2024 / David Burrows
Issue: 8059 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Family
printer mail-detail
158887
Are parties’ fundamental rights being overlooked by family courts? David Burrows delves into the weeds
  • What is the procedure for an English and Welsh resident to seek permission to apply for financial provision after a foreign divorce?
  • What must a respondent to an application for permission prove to set aside a successful without notice application for permission?

Procedure for a Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III application

The Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (MFPA 1984), Part III was introduced into family proceedings to enable a claimant spouse or civil partner to apply to the court for permission to apply for financial relief following an overseas family breakdown (MFPA 1984, s 13(1)). Much is left by the Act to rules of court. And it is mostly to the procedure set up under the Act that this article and its discussion of Potanina v Potanin [2024] UKSC 3 (31 January 2024) is devoted; for, as the Supreme Court points out in that case, the rules

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll