header-logo header-logo

Power to the consumer?

17 June 2010
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

John Bramhall & Karen Boto predict potential future trends in litigation

The Financial Services Act (the Act) was passed on 8 April 2010, and includes provisions relating to the introduction of consumer redress schemes in the financial services sector. The Act reserves the power to the Treasury to broaden the provisions to cover other industries. For the moment, the controversial proposals to allow consumers to issue collective proceedings have been dropped. It does, however, remain possible that those proposals may be reintroduced. Both consumer redress schemes and collective actions could have a significant effect on litigation, but will we really see a trend towards US-style class actions?

Consumer redress schemes

Previously the FSA had to seek authorisation from the Treasury before pursuing consumer redress schemes. Under the Act the Financial Services Authority (FSA) can on its own authority require firms to operate a consumer redress scheme where (i) it appears (to the FSA) that there may have been a “widespread or regular failure” by a firm relating to any regulated activity; and (ii) consumers have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll