header-logo header-logo

Power to the consumer?

17 June 2010
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

John Bramhall & Karen Boto predict potential future trends in litigation

The Financial Services Act (the Act) was passed on 8 April 2010, and includes provisions relating to the introduction of consumer redress schemes in the financial services sector. The Act reserves the power to the Treasury to broaden the provisions to cover other industries. For the moment, the controversial proposals to allow consumers to issue collective proceedings have been dropped. It does, however, remain possible that those proposals may be reintroduced. Both consumer redress schemes and collective actions could have a significant effect on litigation, but will we really see a trend towards US-style class actions?

Consumer redress schemes

Previously the FSA had to seek authorisation from the Treasury before pursuing consumer redress schemes. Under the Act the Financial Services Authority (FSA) can on its own authority require firms to operate a consumer redress scheme where (i) it appears (to the FSA) that there may have been a “widespread or regular failure” by a firm relating to any regulated activity; and (ii) consumers have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll