header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 June 2010
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Power to the consumer?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

John Bramhall & Karen Boto predict potential future trends in litigation

The Financial Services Act (the Act) was passed on 8 April 2010, and includes provisions relating to the introduction of consumer redress schemes in the financial services sector. The Act reserves the power to the Treasury to broaden the provisions to cover other industries. For the moment, the controversial proposals to allow consumers to issue collective proceedings have been dropped. It does, however, remain possible that those proposals may be reintroduced. Both consumer redress schemes and collective actions could have a significant effect on litigation, but will we really see a trend towards US-style class actions?

Consumer redress schemes

Previously the FSA had to seek authorisation from the Treasury before pursuing consumer redress schemes. Under the Act the Financial Services Authority (FSA) can on its own authority require firms to operate a consumer redress scheme where (i) it appears (to the FSA) that there may have been a “widespread or regular failure” by a firm relating to any regulated activity; and (ii) consumers have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll