header-logo header-logo

12 March 2009 / Jonathan Wragg
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Power to the people

How can the government encourage greater public engagement? asks Jonathan Wragg

It is fair to say that local government matters do not tend to fire the imagination of the general public. Frequently, electors’ views are only made known when something is about to be closed—such as a residential care home or a school. This apathy is reflected in the turnout at local government elections which has been falling steadily in recent years.

Research commissioned by the government suggests that voters are more likely to be interested in matters that affect them directly. With this in mind, the government has introduced a number of measures giving electors greater powers to become involved in matters that interest them and that they have the power to change.

Powers of the public
e-petitions

The government has been quick to recognise that if it seeks to secure greater public engagement in respect of the democratic process it need look no further than the prime minister’s website. The ability to create online e-petitions on www.number10.gov.uk has been a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll