header-logo header-logo

08 September 2011 / Angus Nurse
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Features , Judicial review , Public
printer mail-detail

Power to the people

Angus Nurse welcomes proposals to reform the public services ombudsmen

If implemented, the Law Commission’s new proposals to reform the public services ombudsmen make a significant contribution to access to justice. Their potential impact is to make the ombudsmen’s services a real alternative to judicial review for certain types of complaint and significantly improve access to the ombudsmen.

Representatives of the people

Ombudsmen are independent complaints investigators who investigate maladministration and where this is found and a complainant has been caused injustice, recommend a remedy to resolve the complaint. The service is usually free to use and remedies can include requiring an organisation to provide a service, pay compensation, change its policies and procedures and consider whether it also needs to provide recompense to others.

There are a range of public services ombudsmen and practices vary across the jurisdictions. The proposals, published in July, attempt to harmonise and modernise practice among all five public services ombudsmen in England and Wales. The proposals should be seen in the context of the Open

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll