header-logo header-logo

08 September 2011 / Angus Nurse
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Features , Judicial review , Public
printer mail-detail

Power to the people

Angus Nurse welcomes proposals to reform the public services ombudsmen

If implemented, the Law Commission’s new proposals to reform the public services ombudsmen make a significant contribution to access to justice. Their potential impact is to make the ombudsmen’s services a real alternative to judicial review for certain types of complaint and significantly improve access to the ombudsmen.

Representatives of the people

Ombudsmen are independent complaints investigators who investigate maladministration and where this is found and a complainant has been caused injustice, recommend a remedy to resolve the complaint. The service is usually free to use and remedies can include requiring an organisation to provide a service, pay compensation, change its policies and procedures and consider whether it also needs to provide recompense to others.

There are a range of public services ombudsmen and practices vary across the jurisdictions. The proposals, published in July, attempt to harmonise and modernise practice among all five public services ombudsmen in England and Wales. The proposals should be seen in the context of the Open

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll