header-logo header-logo

08 September 2011 / Angus Nurse
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Features , Judicial review , Public
printer mail-detail

Power to the people

Angus Nurse welcomes proposals to reform the public services ombudsmen

If implemented, the Law Commission’s new proposals to reform the public services ombudsmen make a significant contribution to access to justice. Their potential impact is to make the ombudsmen’s services a real alternative to judicial review for certain types of complaint and significantly improve access to the ombudsmen.

Representatives of the people

Ombudsmen are independent complaints investigators who investigate maladministration and where this is found and a complainant has been caused injustice, recommend a remedy to resolve the complaint. The service is usually free to use and remedies can include requiring an organisation to provide a service, pay compensation, change its policies and procedures and consider whether it also needs to provide recompense to others.

There are a range of public services ombudsmen and practices vary across the jurisdictions. The proposals, published in July, attempt to harmonise and modernise practice among all five public services ombudsmen in England and Wales. The proposals should be seen in the context of the Open

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll