header-logo header-logo

27 April 2018 / Sarah Moore
Issue: 7790 / Categories: Features , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Power to the people

nlj_7790_moore

Sarah Moore reviews the current state of product liability in the UK, & asks: is it time for a consumer revolution?

  • A recently announced review may be a sign that the regulatory and legislative frameworks surrounding pharmaceuticals and medical devices are no longer fit for purpose.

On 21 February 2018, the government announced an official review into the way in which consumer concerns have been handled by regulators and lawmakers in the UK. The review, to be chaired by Baroness Cumberlege, will focus on three specific products marketed historically and/or currently within the UK, including:

  • Primodos—a hormone-based pregnancy test used in the UK between 1953-75 which campaigners allege has caused birth defects in their children.
  • Sodium Valproate—a drug to control epilepsy, marketed in the UK since the 1970s and still available; alleged to have caused physical and cognitive birth defects in children born to mothers using the drug at the time of conception.
  • Vaginal mesh—a medical device, still available in the UK, allegedly associated with extreme pain and damage to internal organs of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll