header-logo header-logo

16 October 2015 / Clare Arthurs , Richard Marshall
Issue: 7672 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A practical alphabet

nlj_7672_a-z

Clare Arthurs & Richard Marshall share an (almost) A-Z guide to freezing injunctions

Adequate remedy

The applicant must show why compensatory damages are not an adequate remedy.

Brace yourself

If you are the applicant, prepare for the respondent to criticise and challenge your application. If you are the respondent, prepare to do battle!

CPR 25

The Rule, and its practice direction. Have you read it recently? Read it again!

Dissipation

What evidence is there that the respondent will/not dispose of his assets?

Ex parte hearing

The court will only to agree to grant an injunction without notice if there is good reason to do so: i.e. exceptional urgency and/or evidence of dissipation.

Full and frank disclosure

The applicant must present all material elements of the case to the court, both legal and factual, whether they support or undermine the application.

Good arguable case

The minimum threshold for obtaining an injunction.

Honesty

Is definitely the best policy. Failure to comply with the duty to give full and frank disclosure throughout the life of the injunction may

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll