header-logo header-logo

18 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice

Re Pablo Star Ltd Price v Registrar of Companies and another [2016] EWHC 2640 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 66 (Nov)

The Chancery Division allowed an appeal against the joinder of the second defendant, a division of the Welsh government which promoted tourism in Wales, to proceedings in which it sought to challenge the restoration of a company to the register of companies. The claimant director and sole shareholder of the company in question had successfully sought its restoration to the register to pursue proceedings for breach of copyright in respect of a photograph. The court held that, applying settled principles, the defendant was not entitled to be joined to oppose the restoration of the company simply because it was a potential defendant in the copyright proceedings and was not entitled to be joined to oppose the restoration because the company might or might not have successfully assigned part of its rights to another company. The court held that a desire by a third part to assist the court in determining whether it had been misled in the way

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll