header-logo header-logo

30 June 2017
Issue: 7752 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice

Re Mason & Sons Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation); Richardson and another v White and another [2017] EWHC 1512 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 141 (Jun)

The Companies Court considered whether a trial should go ahead in respect of a claim brought by the joint liquidators of a company in creditors’ voluntary liquidation against the respondent former administrators, and subsequently, former liquidators, of the company.

By their claim, the current liquidators of the company sought a declaration that the respondents had misapplied, retained, or become accountable for, money or other property of the company, and/or were guilty of misfeasance, breach of fiduciary or other duty in relation to the company. The respondents denied that there had been dishonesty on their part and the first respondent sought to settle the claim.

The court ruled, among other things, that, in respect of the first respondent, an order would be made that reflected the offers he had made, which gave to the applicants everything they claimed in the proceedings. However, on the terms of those offers, there would be no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll