header-logo header-logo

Practice

30 June 2017
Issue: 7752 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Mason & Sons Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation); Richardson and another v White and another [2017] EWHC 1512 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 141 (Jun)

The Companies Court considered whether a trial should go ahead in respect of a claim brought by the joint liquidators of a company in creditors’ voluntary liquidation against the respondent former administrators, and subsequently, former liquidators, of the company.

By their claim, the current liquidators of the company sought a declaration that the respondents had misapplied, retained, or become accountable for, money or other property of the company, and/or were guilty of misfeasance, breach of fiduciary or other duty in relation to the company. The respondents denied that there had been dishonesty on their part and the first respondent sought to settle the claim.

The court ruled, among other things, that, in respect of the first respondent, an order would be made that reflected the offers he had made, which gave to the applicants everything they claimed in the proceedings. However, on the terms of those offers, there would be no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll