header-logo header-logo

15 February 2013
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice and procedure—Payment into court—Principles to be applied

Lazari v London & Newcastle (Camden) Ltd [2013] EWHC 97 (TCC)

31 January 2013, Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court, Akenhead J 

The Technology and Construction Court has set out principles to be applied in making an order for payment into court pursuant to CPR 3.1. 

Jonathan Lee (instructed by Charles Russell LLP) for the claimant. Jessica Stephens (instructed by Fladgate LLP) for the defendant. 

The defendant was the long leaseholder of a site in London NW1. It engaged consultants and contractors to design and construct a substantial number of luxury flats and social housing at the site. By agreement of September 2010, the defendant agreed to complete the construction of one of the flats and sell it to the claimant on a long lease. The claimant maintained that there was a continuing defect or problem in the form of excessive overheating of her flat. After initially denying liability, the defendant eventually initiated remedial works in or about mid-2012, followed by further work

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll