header-logo header-logo

07 April 2011
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Practice—Parties—Representative proceedings

Millharbour Management Ltd and others v Weston Homes Ltd and another company, [2011] EWHC 661 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 308 (Mar)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court Akenhead J, 22 Mar 2011

The Technology and Construction Court has given guidance as to the circumstances in which a party can effectively secure that it acts as a representative on behalf of other persons who are not parties to the proceedings, under CPR 19.6 (1).

Anthony Speaight QC (instructed by Cubism Law) for the claimants. David Friedman QC and James Leabeater (instructed by MacFarlanes) for the defendants.

The first claimant was the management company for a property. Eighty eight of the flats were social housing, sold on a 999 year lease to the second claimant housing association, which sub-let them to tenants. The remainder were sold to individual tenants. In 2010, the first and second claimants, together with 42 private leaseholders, issued proceedings against the defendants for alleged breaches of the Defective Premises Act 1972 in relation to the construction of the development, and against the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll