header-logo header-logo

Practice—Parties—Representative proceedings

07 April 2011
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Millharbour Management Ltd and others v Weston Homes Ltd and another company, [2011] EWHC 661 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 308 (Mar)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court Akenhead J, 22 Mar 2011

The Technology and Construction Court has given guidance as to the circumstances in which a party can effectively secure that it acts as a representative on behalf of other persons who are not parties to the proceedings, under CPR 19.6 (1).

Anthony Speaight QC (instructed by Cubism Law) for the claimants. David Friedman QC and James Leabeater (instructed by MacFarlanes) for the defendants.

The first claimant was the management company for a property. Eighty eight of the flats were social housing, sold on a 999 year lease to the second claimant housing association, which sub-let them to tenants. The remainder were sold to individual tenants. In 2010, the first and second claimants, together with 42 private leaseholders, issued proceedings against the defendants for alleged breaches of the Defective Premises Act 1972 in relation to the construction of the development, and against the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll