header-logo header-logo

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Pre-trial or post-judgment relief—Freezing order

PJSC Vseukrainskyi Aktsionernyi Bank v Maksimov and other companies [2013] EWHC 422 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 64 (Mar)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Popplewell J, 7 Mar 2013

The High Court has given guidance on the jurisdiction in T.S.B Private Bank International SA v Chabra [1992] 2 All ER 245 (the Chabra jurisdiction) concerning freezing orders against the ultimate beneficial owner of the assets of a corporate defendant.

Mr D’Cruz (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the claimant. Ms Healy (instructed by Ince & Co) for the corporate defendants.

The claimant bank was a public joint stock company incorporated under Ukrainian law. It obtained a freezing order against the second to the fourth defendants (the corporate defendants), which were companies registered under the laws of England and Wales. The bank brought arbitration proceedings in London against the first defendant, M. The proceedings concerned a framework agreement under which M was to sell a major stake in the bank to another major shareholder (TBIF). The sale was subject to conditions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll