header-logo header-logo

Practice—Pre-trial or post-judgment relief—Freezing order

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

PJSC Vseukrainskyi Aktsionernyi Bank v Maksimov and other companies [2013] EWHC 422 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 64 (Mar)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Popplewell J, 7 Mar 2013

The High Court has given guidance on the jurisdiction in T.S.B Private Bank International SA v Chabra [1992] 2 All ER 245 (the Chabra jurisdiction) concerning freezing orders against the ultimate beneficial owner of the assets of a corporate defendant.

Mr D’Cruz (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the claimant. Ms Healy (instructed by Ince & Co) for the corporate defendants.

The claimant bank was a public joint stock company incorporated under Ukrainian law. It obtained a freezing order against the second to the fourth defendants (the corporate defendants), which were companies registered under the laws of England and Wales. The bank brought arbitration proceedings in London against the first defendant, M. The proceedings concerned a framework agreement under which M was to sell a major stake in the bank to another major shareholder (TBIF). The sale was subject to conditions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll