header-logo header-logo

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Pre-trial or post-judgment relief—Freezing order

PJSC Vseukrainskyi Aktsionernyi Bank v Maksimov and other companies [2013] EWHC 422 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 64 (Mar)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Popplewell J, 7 Mar 2013

The High Court has given guidance on the jurisdiction in T.S.B Private Bank International SA v Chabra [1992] 2 All ER 245 (the Chabra jurisdiction) concerning freezing orders against the ultimate beneficial owner of the assets of a corporate defendant.

Mr D’Cruz (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the claimant. Ms Healy (instructed by Ince & Co) for the corporate defendants.

The claimant bank was a public joint stock company incorporated under Ukrainian law. It obtained a freezing order against the second to the fourth defendants (the corporate defendants), which were companies registered under the laws of England and Wales. The bank brought arbitration proceedings in London against the first defendant, M. The proceedings concerned a framework agreement under which M was to sell a major stake in the bank to another major shareholder (TBIF). The sale was subject to conditions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll