header-logo header-logo

21 February 2014
Issue: 7595 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Relief from sanction—CPR 3.9

Newland Shipping & Forwarding Ltd v Toba Trading FZC [2014] EWHC 210 (Comm)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Hamblen J, 6 February 2014

The Commercial Court has considered the effect of Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1537. As a general rule, relief will not be granted against sanction unless (i) the non-compliance was trivial or (ii) there was good reason for the default.

Richard Slade QC and Edward Harrison (instructed by Holman Fenwick Willan LLP) for the claimant. Stephen Cogley QC and Peter Ferrer (instructed by Stephenson Harwood LLP) for the first and third defendants.

The claimant supplied oil products to the first defendant, an Iranian-owned company engaged in trading oil and gasoline related products. The first defendant made certain advance payments, but failed to pay the full amount due for the cargoes, which were sold elsewhere. The second defendant was said to be the commercial manager and shareholder of the first defendant. The third defendant was said to be a board member

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll