header-logo header-logo

Practice—Striking out—Power to strike out claim following trial

06 July 2012
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Fairclough Homes Ltd v Summers [2012] UKSC 26, [2012] All ER (D) 179 (Jun)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson and Lord Reed SCJJ, 27 Jun 2012

Following a trial at which the court has found a defendant liable in damages to the claimant in an ascertained sum, the court nevertheless retains power to strike out the claimant’s statement of case on the basis that it is an abuse of process, though the power is for exceptional circumstances.

Craig Sephton QC and Hugh Davies (instructed by SAS Daniels LLP) for the employee. William Norris QC, James Todd and Sadie Crapper (instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP) for the employer.

In May 2003, while employed by the defendant, the claimant was injured in an accident at work. He suffered two fractures. In October 2003, the defendant admitted liability. The claimant brought a claim alleging breach of duty or negligence. Following a trial, in August 2007, the claimant obtained judgment on liability with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll