header-logo header-logo

Practice—Summary judgment—Appeal

14 June 2012
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

CXX v DXX [2012] EWHC 1535 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 22 (Jun)

 

Queen’s Bench Division, Spencer J, 1 Jun 2012

It is not automatically an abuse of process in civil proceedings to seek to show that a criminal conviction was wrong; all depends on the facts. 

Richard Davison (instructed by Bolt Burdon Kemp) for the claimant. Satinder Hunjan QC (instructed by Hutton’s) for the defendant.

The claimant was a medical secretary working at the hospital at which the defendant worked as a consultant physician. In 2007, they began a sexual relationship. The claimant became pregnant. She informed the defendant and he tried to persuade her to have an abortion. She alleged that on three occasions he administered or attempted to administer drugs to her in order to procure an abortion.

She alleged that that was done by placing the drugs into her drinks. The defendant was convicted of attempting to administer poison on two of the alleged occasions. He was refused permission to appeal against conviction by the Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll