header-logo header-logo

Practice—Summary judgment—Appeal

14 June 2012
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

CXX v DXX [2012] EWHC 1535 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 22 (Jun)

 

Queen’s Bench Division, Spencer J, 1 Jun 2012

It is not automatically an abuse of process in civil proceedings to seek to show that a criminal conviction was wrong; all depends on the facts. 

Richard Davison (instructed by Bolt Burdon Kemp) for the claimant. Satinder Hunjan QC (instructed by Hutton’s) for the defendant.

The claimant was a medical secretary working at the hospital at which the defendant worked as a consultant physician. In 2007, they began a sexual relationship. The claimant became pregnant. She informed the defendant and he tried to persuade her to have an abortion. She alleged that on three occasions he administered or attempted to administer drugs to her in order to procure an abortion.

She alleged that that was done by placing the drugs into her drinks. The defendant was convicted of attempting to administer poison on two of the alleged occasions. He was refused permission to appeal against conviction by the Court of Appeal. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll