header-logo header-logo

15 February 2013
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Technology & Construction Court—Preliminary issues

Aldersgate Estates Ltd v Ham Construction Ltd and another [2013] EWHC 104 (TCC)

Technology and Construction Court, Akenhead J, 31 January 2013

The variety of preliminary issues is infinite and the timing of any application to the court for an order that preliminary issues be determined may vary from the institution of proceedings to the commencement of a trial; accordingly, there is no exhaustive list of factors for the court to consider before ordering a trial of preliminary issues and each case will turn on its own facts.

John Denis-Smith (instructed by Walker Morris) for the claimant. Naomi Stafford of Pinsent Mason LLP for the first defendant. Joanna Smith QC (instructed by Plexus Law) for the second defendant.

The claimant was a property development company. It redeveloped a property in Bradford between about 2004 and 2008. It retained the second defendant as consulting engineers to provide engineering design services and the first defendant as its contractor. Part of the work involved the retention of an existing facade

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll