header-logo header-logo

15 February 2013
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Technology & Construction Court—Preliminary issues

Aldersgate Estates Ltd v Ham Construction Ltd and another [2013] EWHC 104 (TCC)

Technology and Construction Court, Akenhead J, 31 January 2013

The variety of preliminary issues is infinite and the timing of any application to the court for an order that preliminary issues be determined may vary from the institution of proceedings to the commencement of a trial; accordingly, there is no exhaustive list of factors for the court to consider before ordering a trial of preliminary issues and each case will turn on its own facts.

John Denis-Smith (instructed by Walker Morris) for the claimant. Naomi Stafford of Pinsent Mason LLP for the first defendant. Joanna Smith QC (instructed by Plexus Law) for the second defendant.

The claimant was a property development company. It redeveloped a property in Bradford between about 2004 and 2008. It retained the second defendant as consulting engineers to provide engineering design services and the first defendant as its contractor. Part of the work involved the retention of an existing facade

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll