header-logo header-logo

Practice—Technology & Construction Court—Preliminary issues

15 February 2013
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Aldersgate Estates Ltd v Ham Construction Ltd and another [2013] EWHC 104 (TCC)

Technology and Construction Court, Akenhead J, 31 January 2013

The variety of preliminary issues is infinite and the timing of any application to the court for an order that preliminary issues be determined may vary from the institution of proceedings to the commencement of a trial; accordingly, there is no exhaustive list of factors for the court to consider before ordering a trial of preliminary issues and each case will turn on its own facts.

John Denis-Smith (instructed by Walker Morris) for the claimant. Naomi Stafford of Pinsent Mason LLP for the first defendant. Joanna Smith QC (instructed by Plexus Law) for the second defendant.

The claimant was a property development company. It redeveloped a property in Bradford between about 2004 and 2008. It retained the second defendant as consulting engineers to provide engineering design services and the first defendant as its contractor. Part of the work involved the retention of an existing facade

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll